Talk:Villains

From Sentinel Comics Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Is there a reason that multi-nemesis villains do not list each symbol? Carnilius (talk) 14:00, 16 September 2016 (CDT)
    • Formatting reasons. The Empty Circle icon makes it look pretty. The individual pages have all their icons inside. Admin (talk) 16:49, 16 September 2016 (CDT)
      • I disagree about the Empty Circle icon, but I guess that's a matter of taste. To me that says "information missing". Carnilius (talk) 11:43, 19 September 2016 (CDT)
        • I'll look into a few ways to do it with showing all that doesn't disrupt the tables and make a lot of dead space Admin (talk) 16:06, 19 September 2016 (CDT)
        • ok. That does look good. Nice call. Admin (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2016 (CDT)


  • Should Vengeance villains who are not standalone still by marked with Vengeance deck, or somehow still marked as non standalone? Carnilius (talk) 14:00, 16 September 2016 (CDT)
    • Probably. I'm going through and adding Sentinel Tactics indications to all characters and will do the same for Villain decks that are stand alone. Admin (talk) 16:49, 16 September 2016 (CDT)


  • La Capitan - Article or not? Yes La is in article, (like The for those who are not familiar with that term) but La Capitan isn't 'The Captain', she is La Capitan. Honestly, I don't have a preference one way or another, but it is an interesting discussion. Should she be under C or L? Admin (talk) 18:17, 12 December 2016 (CST)
    • I'd say she should ordered by the L. --Sonvar (talk) 08:11, 14 December 2016 (CST)
    • I'm a Spanish speaker so for me it should naturally be under C. --Fabikw (talk) 14:07, 14 December 2016 (CST)
    • I'm fine with it either way. It's already ordered by the C so leave it --Sonvar (talk) 14:45, 14 December 2016 (CST)
    • Well... It's already ordered by C because I moved it there. In the card text spreadsheet, it is ordered by C. --Fabikw (talk) 18:27, 14 December 2016 (CST)
  • Should each Villain page also contain the information in the Villain card? Given that heroes have their innate power, I think they should. --Fabikw (talk) 14:07, 14 December 2016 (CST)
    • If we are allowed to post that then yes. --Sonvar (talk) 14:46, 14 December 2016 (CST)
    • Not a bad idea. May not fit in the side bar though, its rather long for most villains. When I get a moment to redesign the character pages I'll find room for it. Admin (talk) 17:30, 14 December 2016 (CST)


  • Besides updating difficulties based off of the video game, I put the image file for difficulty rank after each variant or vengeance deck. I think it makes it a lot easier to see than the text in parenthesis. Any thoughts on this? --Nathaniel241 (talk) 14:46, 14 December 2016 (CST)
    • If i have time this weekend I might add a new box to the right of the vairant name, all the way over to the left of the current difficulty box to put these numbers in. Or I might split up the difficulty box for each line. The table code is pretty hairy as it is, but I think it be good to get them in a consistent space. -- other than that, thanks for putting these in!Lynkfox (talk) 06:50, 25 March 2017 (CDT)
  • Seems fine. Some of them could change again with the OblivAeon release but it can stay as is until we see otherwise. --Sonvar (talk) 18:08, 23 March 2017 (CDT)
  • It's what I was going to eventually do anyway. I really want to dig into this page at some point and turn the table into something fully sortable... or at least structured in a way that organizes the variants and their complexities and editions more cleanly. Jeysie (talk) 20:28, 23 March 2017 (CDT)
    • You're gonna have to really redo how i made the table then. I did a lot of colspan and rowspan and i for the life of me couldn't get it to sort in a way that didn't leave variants behind in the wrong places. Lynkfox (talk) 06:50, 25 March 2017 (CDT)
      • I figured as much; I can tell it's one monster of a table just by looking at it. I think splitting up the complexity/difficulty column at minimum like you mentioned above would be a good idea, though. Jeysie (talk) 07:33, 25 March 2017 (CDT)
      • Addendum: Really the sticky part of sorting would be the base villain name and nemesis icon, which I don't think there's any good way around. Meh. Oh well, we'll eventually have the sorted Complexity/Difficulty categories anyway. (I can think of various alternate ways to display things visually, but nothing that really would make the tables sortable without turning it really awkward-looking in various ways.) Jeysie (talk) 07:56, 25 March 2017 (CDT)



  • Yep. So thats how we're going to sort the table. Use the code I just finished. I'll update the table when I'm done updating the Villain pages to the new format if no one has gone through the table and used the new code here to do it

Lynkfox (talk) 22:44, 27 June 2018 (CDT)